NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
Ischel Gonzalez Kelso ; Prasanna Tadi .
Last Update: November 7, 2022 .
The cognitive assessment is useful to test for cognitive impairment—a deficiency in knowledge, thought process, or judgment. Psychiatrists often perform cognitive testing during the Mental Status Exam. However, when cognitive impairment is suspected, the cognitive assessment can obtain a more detailed analysis by surveying the neuropsychological domains. This detailed investigation of cognition can diagnose major cognitive impairment (ie, dementia) and mild cognitive impairment, evaluate traumatic brain injuries, help determine decision-making capacity, and survey intellectual dysfunction.[1][2][3][4]
There are many established tools used to conduct cognitive assessments. Each is carefully constructed to evaluate neuropsychological domains such as memory, language, executive function, abstract reasoning, attention, and visuospatial skills. Available assessment tools range from those designed to evaluate a single neuropsychological domain to mental status screens that survey multiple neuropsychological domains to the most extensive test. This complete neuropsychological exam assesses each neuropsychological domain.[5]
Most clinicians will use an established mental status screening tool such as the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to determine if cognitive impairment is present. Mental status screens are short, efficient, and well-researched modalities for evaluating multiple cognitive domains. A cognitive assessment, along with a good history, physical exam, and appropriate labs and imaging, can establish a diagnosis or decide if further evaluation is necessary.[2][6]
A complete neuropsychological evaluation is an option if a screening test is inconclusive or more information is required. A full neuropsychological evaluation would ideally identify the patient’s specific deficits, differentiate between neurological and psychological etiologies, differentiate between Alzheimer’s dementia and other dementias, localize the deficits, and help formulate a personalized management plan. This exam is noninvasive and involves a battery of assessments a trained professional performs. This comprehensive evaluation can take up to a full day to complete. While a full neuropsychological evaluation is the most detailed assessment, it is unnecessary for all patients who have a diagnosis or suspicion of cognitive impairment. However, it can be a helpful resource if there are questions or concerns about a diagnosis or care.[7][8]
How to Performing a Cognitive Assessment
When performing a cognitive assessment, the clinician must take a good patient history and perform a physical exam; this ensures that the patients receive a thorough evaluation while strengthening the caregiver-patient relationship. Suppose the assumption is that the patient has cognitive impairment before considering other diagnoses. In that case, the patient may feel that the clinician has dismissed them due to their age, level of education, or other reasons. A thorough examination can also help identify any behavior or personality disorders potentially contributing to the patient’s chief complaints, as mild cognitive impairments or dementia often coexist with behavioral and personality disturbances. Cognitively impaired patients cannot express themselves fully, so it is very beneficial to have someone with a close relationship with the patient present to help establish baseline levels of functioning.
Before deciding upon a particular testing modality, one should compare all available tests to find the best suited for the administrator and the patient. One should be mindful that some institutions may have a preferred testing modality.[9]
Cognitive Assessment Screens
Various cognitive assessment screens exist, each with instructions, templates (if applicable), and often a website. Below is a short list of the more popular screening tools and their strengths and weaknesses.
The MMSE usually takes less than ten minutes to administer, is easy to use, and has been thoroughly researched since 1975. However, what was once the gold standard in cognitive assessments is now used less frequently due to copyright laws and additional costs.
The MoCA is another popular screening tool that takes approximately ten minutes to complete. It evaluates visuospatial skills, attention, language, abstract reasoning, delayed recall, executive function, and orientation.[10] The MoCA covers more domains than the MMSE and, consequently, has greater sensitivity and specificity.[6] The associated website includes specific adaptations for different populations, many different languages, printable versions of the test, and training opportunities.
The Mini-Cog is one of the faster cognitive assessment screens that is used. It consists of a 3-item recall and a clock-drawing test. The delayed 3-item recall tests memory, while the clock drawing test evaluates cognitive function, language, executive function, and visuospatial skills. The Mini-Cog website also gives detailed instructions for administrators.
Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam
Initially developed for the veteran population, the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam (SLUMS) is another tool with an online printable testing form. Its website has an instructional outline for administrators, training opportunities, and a wide range of language options.
Other modalities include but are not limited to the Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test, Kokmen Short Test of Mental Status, Memory Impairment Screen, Ottawa 3DY, Brief Alzheimer’s Screen, Caregiver-completed AD8, and many other dementia screening scales.[11]
The results of these assessments require review in the context of each patient. Each administrator should remember that a screening test is not a substitute for a diagnostic workup. Lastly, it mentions that no current data supports using cognitive assessments in asymptomatic patients.
Neuropsychological Domains
Cognitive assessments evaluate for cognitive impairment by assessing the neuropsychological domains. A brief explanation of the frequently tested domains follows.
The language domain involves naming, reading, writing, and repeating words. Some practitioners will evaluate the language by noting the patient’s communication skills throughout the interview. There are many ways to test for language. Two neurocognitive tests include the Boston Naming Test and the Controlled Oral Word Association.[12] It should be noted that a part of the language domain can become mildly impaired with normal aging. Expressive aphasia, which is the inability to find words, can become impaired with normal aging.
Executive function
This assessment encompasses organizing, planning, working memory, mental flexibility, list-making, and executing tasks. An example of executive function impairment might be a patient who cannot follow recipes or cook as well as they used to. Executive function testing is often done by naming as many categorical items as possible; for example, naming as many animals as possible in one minute. Other neuropsychological tests include the Trail Making Tests A and B and the Wisconsin Sorting Test.[12][6]
Abstract reasoning
Abstract reasoning refers to analyzing information, detecting patterns and relationships, or solving problems on an intangible, theoretical level. An example of abstract reasoning skills would be identifying patterns or relationships between things that do not appear to be similar. Another example would be the ability to solve problems without the knowledge it would normally take.[13][14] Abstract reasoning is often tested by having the patient describe similes, analogies, proverbs, or sayings. For example, recognizing the relationship between an airplane and a bicycle is that they are both modes of transportation. Some neuropsychological abstract reasoning tests include the Shipley-2 Abstract Test, Gorham’s Proverbs Test, Conceptual Level Analogy Test, and Verbal Concept Attainment Test.[15]
Memory is the mechanism that takes information encodes, stores it, and retrieves it for later use.[16] Different kinds of memory make this domain very complicated.
Memory is divided into short-term and long-term memory. Short-term memory can take small pieces of information and utilize them briefly. Long-term memory is subdivided into procedural and declarative, further divided into episodic and semantic. Procedural memory is storing information used to perform or complete tasks that are often done, like driving a car. Declarative memory is the storing and recall of facts and events, such as a family member’s birthday. Episodic memory is contextual information storing or remembering things from a specific experience. An example of episodic memory is the patient remembering what they did for their last birthday. Semantic memory is more general knowledge or factual-based memory, including learned subjects such as math.
Because memory is so complex, it is essential to recognize and document what is under evaluation during this assessment. Memory impairment can be easy to pinpoint from the patient’s history, but it can also masquerade as other things, such as having trouble learning new information.[9] It is also worth noting that normal aging can slightly impair memory. A normal aging patient’s activities of daily living will remain intact.
Attention/concentration
Testing for attention and concentration often takes place together. They are frequently tested by spelling words backward or serially subtracting numbers from a large starting point, such as the MoCA, where the examiner asks the patient to subtract seven from 100 in five increments. Some clinicians observe the patient and assess their level of attention throughout the interview.[9] The Connors Continuous Performance Test is an example of a neuropsychological test that acknowledges attention and concentration.[6]
Visuospatial skills
This concept is a person’s ability to conceptualize and manipulate 2- and 3-dimensional objects. Testing is often done by copying figures, block designs, or clock drawings.[17] This skill set may be difficult to assess while taking a history. Still, it could present as a patient suddenly having difficulty with parallel parking their car or getting into small accidents.[9] In neuropsychology, an example of a test used for these skills is the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Copy Test.[12]
Standardized cognitive assessments help create a universal diagnosis, but these tests are imperfect. Scoring can be subjective, conclusions may be drawn based on assumptions, and screening tests have statistical limitations.
If not done correctly, the scoring of these exams can be very subjective. Each result is administrator-specific and accordingly introduces the possibility of human error. Some studies show that scoring leniency can negatively affect the test's sensitivity. To control this variable, many assessment websites give clear instructions and provide tutorials on properly administering and scoring their assessment.[1][18][1][19]
Some of the cognitive assessment screens are undergoing development with limited testing within a cognitive domain. For example, the Mini-Cog tests for memory; it does not test the semantics of long-term procedural memory. Understanding that most available assessments are just screening tests is integral to the assessment’s use.[20][19]
It is also important to remember the statistics when using screening tests. One must be cognizant of inevitable false positives and negatives when the sensitivity and specificity are not 100%.[21]
Some tests may better identify certain impairments over others—for example, some identify mild cognitive impairment versus major cognitive impairment. The clinician must understand each test, what the test measures, and the limitations of the test. Lastly, cognitive assessments done in the clinical setting are screening tests and must be used along with clinical judgment in the context of each patient presentation.[21]
With medicine and technology continually improving, people are living longer lives. With a population that is increasing in age, the prevalence of cognitive impairment will inevitably rise as cognitive impairment is often age-related.[22] Thus, the diagnosis, management, and research of cognitive impairments are crucial to managing the needs of an aging population.[23][2]
Cognitive assessments are fast, easy-to-use, and accurate ways to help diagnose, evaluate progress, and manage many kinds of cognitive impairment.[4] These assessments use questions and tasks that strategically test for impairment of various cognitive domains at once in a matter of minutes, improving efficiency in the clinic and the lives of many individuals affected by this devastating condition.
The cognitive assessment is useful in determining a patient’s understanding and ability level. This evaluation is especially important to nurses in an in-patient setting, as nurses spend significant time with the patients while hospitalized. Some levels of cognitive impairment will require constant monitoring. Other patients may need help communicating if their language domain is impaired. Each patient has a unique circumstance, and it is up to the healthcare team to identify the deficits and develop a healthcare plan addressing them to provide optimum care. With the help of a cognitive assessment, nurses will not only know that a patient is cognitively impaired, but they will learn which domain may be compromised, thereby allowing the nursing staff to adjust patient approaches or care plans accordingly.[24]
Sanford AM. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017 Aug; 33 (3):325-337. [PubMed : 28689566 ]
Petersen RC. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr; 22 (2 Dementia):404-18. [PMC free article : PMC5390929 ] [PubMed : 27042901 ]
Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M, Guskiewicz KM, Halstead M, Herring SA, Kutcher JS, Pana A, Putukian M, Roberts WO. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan; 47 (1):15-26. [PubMed : 23243113 ]
Snyderman D, Rovner B. Mental status exam in primary care: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Oct 15; 80 (8):809-14. [PubMed : 19835342 ]
Martin RL. Update on dementia of the Alzheimer type. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Jun; 40 (6):593-604. [PubMed : 2661399 ]
Finney GR, Minagar A, Heilman KM. Assessment of Mental Status. Neurol Clin. 2016 Feb; 34 (1):1-16. [PubMed : 26613992 ]
Schroeder RW, Martin PK, Walling A. Neuropsychological Evaluations in Adults. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Jan 15; 99 (2):101-108. [PubMed : 30633479 ]
Zucchella C, Federico A, Martini A, Tinazzi M, Bartolo M, Tamburin S. Neuropsychological testing. Pract Neurol. 2018 Jun; 18 (3):227-237. [PubMed : 29472384 ]
Grossman M, Irwin DJ. The Mental Status Examination in Patients With Suspected Dementia. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr; 22 (2 Dementia):385-403. [PMC free article : PMC5390931 ] [PubMed : 27042900 ]
Krishnan S, Justus S, Meluveettil R, Menon RN, Sarma SP, Kishore A. Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in non-english speaking patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurol India. 2015 Jan-Feb; 63 (1):63-7. [PubMed : 25751471 ]
Carpenter CR, Bassett ER, Fischer GM, Shirshekan J, Galvin JE, Morris JC. Four sensitive screening tools to detect cognitive dysfunction in geriatric emergency department patients: brief Alzheimer's Screen, Short Blessed Test, Ottawa 3DY, and the caregiver-completed AD8. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Apr; 18 (4):374-84. [PMC free article : PMC3080244 ] [PubMed : 21496140 ]
Hansen A, Caselli RJ, Schlosser-Covell G, Golafshar MA, Dueck AC, Woodruff BK, Stonnington CM, Geda YE, Locke DEC. Neuropsychological comparison of incident MCI and prevalent MCI. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018; 10 :599-603. [PMC free article : PMC6234916 ] [PubMed : 30456288 ]
Chierchia G, Fuhrmann D, Knoll LJ, Pi-Sunyer BP, Sakhardande AL, Blakemore SJ. The matrix reasoning item bank (MaRs-IB): novel, open-access abstract reasoning items for adolescents and adults. R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Oct; 6 (10):190232. [PMC free article : PMC6837216 ] [PubMed : 31824684 ]
Green AE, Kenworthy L, Mosner MG, Gallagher NM, Fearon EW, Balhana CD, Yerys BE. Abstract analogical reasoning in high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2014 Dec; 7 (6):677-86. [PMC free article : PMC6100749 ] [PubMed : 25255899 ]
Davies G, Piovesana A. Adult Verbal Abstract Reasoning Assessment Instruments and their Clinimetric Properties. Clin Neuropsychol. 2015; 29 (7):1010-33. [PubMed : 26732461 ]
Jahn H. Memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013 Dec; 15 (4):445-54. [PMC free article : PMC3898682 ] [PubMed : 24459411 ]
Salimi S, Irish M, Foxe D, Hodges JR, Piguet O, Burrell JR. Can visuospatial measures improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease? Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018; 10 :66-74. [PMC free article : PMC5956809 ] [PubMed : 29780858 ]
Diaz-Orueta U, Blanco-Campal A, Burke T. [Process-based approach neuropsychological assessment: review of the evidence and proposal for improvement of dementia screening tools]. Rev Neurol. 2017 Jun 01; 64 (11):514-524. [PubMed : 28555458 ]
Iatraki E, Simos PG, Bertsias A, Duijker G, Zaganas I, Tziraki C, Vgontzas AN, Lionis C., THALIS Primary Health Care Research Team/Network. Cognitive screening tools for primary care settings: examining the 'Test Your Memory' and 'General Practitioner assessment of Cognition' tools in a rural aging population in Greece. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec; 23 (1):171-178. [PMC free article : PMC5774277 ] [PubMed : 28604128 ]
Loewenstein DA, Curiel RE, Duara R, Buschke H. Novel Cognitive Paradigms for the Detection of Memory Impairment in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. Assessment. 2018 Apr; 25 (3):348-359. [PMC free article : PMC5729046 ] [PubMed : 29214859 ]
Ciesielska N, Sokołowski R, Mazur E, Podhorecka M, Polak-Szabela A, Kędziora-Kornatowska K. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis. Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Oct 31; 50 (5):1039-1052. [PubMed : 27992895 ]
Garre-Olmo J. [Epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias]. Rev Neurol. 2018 Jun 01; 66 (11):377-386. [PubMed : 29790571 ]
Bondi MW, Edmonds EC, Salmon DP. Alzheimer's Disease: Past, Present, and Future. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Oct; 23 (9-10):818-831. [PMC free article : PMC5830188 ] [PubMed : 29198280 ]
Persoon A, Banningh LJ, van de Vrie W, Rikkert MG, van Achterberg T. Development of the Nurses' Observation Scale for Cognitive Abilities (NOSCA). ISRN Nurs. 2011; 2011 :895082. [PMC free article : PMC3168942 ] [PubMed : 22007329 ]
Disclosure: Ischel Gonzalez Kelso declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Prasanna Tadi declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
